Right. The King does not endorse politicians or extremists, or those who criticize the current regime. He defends citizens. Juan Carlos knows very well that there are few people who support him, "both left of right-so speaks to the people that is the only one able to discern much media coverage that has taken control of the news in the last week. It seems unfortunate that no one has come to the fore for siding with the King (not the monarchy), noting the benefits it has brought our country the representative figure of Juan Carlos I.
Because of this, coupled with institutional and burning pictures of the criticism of certain radical groups independence, the King decided to respond to these attacks with a speech on the role played by the monarchy in the last thirty years.
"The monarchy has provided the longest period of stability and prosperity in democracy lived in Spain " sentenced King at the opening of the academic year in Oviedo. With this statement, perhaps, Juan Carlos rebuked the actions of the burning of photos or statements of some politicians , as is the case of CIU, where the party claimed that the Crown has not only been a key factor to stabilize the country.
course, but one of the cornerstones of this democracy is precisely the figure of John Carlos and the importance of the monarchy since the transition. That can not be denied. A very different set to debate whether the monarchy XXI century is no longer but a reminiscence of the past obsolete and should be changed to other forms of government. This issue would include a thorough analysis in a society more advanced than ours, I think, that is, the English seem to always have to have someone as a referee or judge who is above us, a head " visible " to provide us some reassurance.
Spain sought for three decades a figure like that I described in the person of the King, and he did not disappoint. In fact, surveys show an enlightening fact: The monarchy is one of the few institutions to approve as positive between conjundo society is more, 85% of respondents believe that the figure of the King has been and is essential for the stability of our country. Juan Carlos knew from the outset to win the sympathy of the people, the closeness to the masses, the warmth of the people. Something that many politicians today try, but without any positive result.
Moreover, the political class to muted criticism of the Crown, merely to defend the Constitution and not much else from my point of view. And while some media is responsible for adding fuel to the fire and warm up the crowd with statements that do not leave indifferent no, I mean criticism Jimenez Los Santos to the personal figure of the King brandishing arguments such as: demanding his abdication of the King or his lack of support for victims of terrorism to a among many other things. Or as I have seen today in the Four mornings, when the presenter has read some other statements by Jiménez-Los Santos: " King should go with their business elsewhere and leave his son as successor."
information All this chaos has been a gap opens on the role of the monarchy in this country. Are we better off with the Republic? ask each; and I replied, "We have gone so wrong with the monarchy?, With a Republic would be given to settle the territorial issue?," end up with problems or increase other?, "The church and the right to accept a republican regime what it all entails?
are questions that go unanswered and that apparently will not ever. But it has begun a period in which to discredit the monarchy is what matters. At least, let's vote of confidence in our constitutional monarchy, although we do not like to admit it, is the least given us problems in recent years.
by Dani.
Free Opinion: Do we need the King to give stability to our democracy?, "The monarchy is an outdated institution?
0 comments:
Post a Comment