Friday, October 5, 2007

How To Mend Breitling From Vietnam

¿A LA CÁRCEL POR CONDUCIR?

This was the question many people will from now because Congress passed a law toughening penalties for traffic offenses. In a few weeks to be at the Senate and be ready before winter.
The measures will be carried out force drivers to be more careful if they infringe the wheel. Drunk driving or going to a speed entail excessive prison sentences as long as the offender causes an accident, but so you only need to perform work for the good of the community or a fine.
criticism to this amendment to the Penal Code are the Popular Party voted against for being "excessive yy too hasty, as PNV and IU, both abstained. The criticisms of these three games are based on new sentences. For IU should overrule such penalties when " the offender drunk or too fast will not cause any accident."
Moreover, popular group defended the change in the alcohol limit by increasing it to 1.5 grams.
From my point of view, citizens should have greater awareness about the problem. People do not see a serious risk to go drunk driving or driving too fast, like going without a belt or skip a traffic light. DGT campaigns absolutely no good at all because we have become accustomed to them. Trafficking victims appear to be a scourge that is below other as victims of abuse or terrorism.
radars, the constant controls the national police and Civil Guard and the neglect of lospolíticos on the subject have made last year, without going any further, 4,104 people die . In fact, the English when asked about traffic accidents, they are not often show very concerned because they consider it "minor."
Now the debate moves to the policy, and indirectly to the polls. For a political party can be a step back this reform, others simply unnecessary or inappropriate. We tend to believe that he who kills with a firearm is more culpable than who goes to a car with a few glasses of "more" and travels in a reckless manner endangering the lives of others.
A mother weeping for her son, is alcual crossed his death because of a "madman at the wheel", is less important than a mother devastated by the murder of his daughter.
People are forgetting that the car is dangerous, simply, " a killing machine" . I hope the new law is not subject to confrontation between the citizens because that would be a bad signal no public awareness about the problem of accidents tráficoa. But we have to discuss our politicians, who by scratching a few thousand votes, do not know what, or whom to criticize.
walk Prisons full of rapists, murderers, pedophiles, etc ... Will we allow drivers join them? Hopefully not. And now, to try to tread less throttle.
by Dani.
Free Opinion: Drivers should go to jail for traffic law enforcement?

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Vasomotor Rhinitis Cured

EL REY DEFIENDE A LOS ESPAÑOLES

Right. The King does not endorse politicians or extremists, or those who criticize the current regime. He defends citizens. Juan Carlos knows very well that there are few people who support him, "both left of right-so speaks to the people that is the only one able to discern much media coverage that has taken control of the news in the last week. It seems unfortunate that no one has come to the fore for siding with the King (not the monarchy), noting the benefits it has brought our country the representative figure of Juan Carlos I.
Because of this, coupled with institutional and burning pictures of the criticism of certain radical groups independence, the King decided to respond to these attacks with a speech on the role played by the monarchy in the last thirty years.
"The monarchy has provided the longest period of stability and prosperity in democracy lived in Spain " sentenced King at the opening of the academic year in Oviedo. With this statement, perhaps, Juan Carlos rebuked the actions of the burning of photos or statements of some politicians , as is the case of CIU, where the party claimed that the Crown has not only been a key factor to stabilize the country.
course, but one of the cornerstones of this democracy is precisely the figure of John Carlos and the importance of the monarchy since the transition. That can not be denied. A very different set to debate whether the monarchy XXI century is no longer but a reminiscence of the past obsolete and should be changed to other forms of government. This issue would include a thorough analysis in a society more advanced than ours, I think, that is, the English seem to always have to have someone as a referee or judge who is above us, a head " visible " to provide us some reassurance.
Spain sought for three decades a figure like that I described in the person of the King, and he did not disappoint. In fact, surveys show an enlightening fact: The monarchy is one of the few institutions to approve as positive between conjundo society is more, 85% of respondents believe that the figure of the King has been and is essential for the stability of our country. Juan Carlos knew from the outset to win the sympathy of the people, the closeness to the masses, the warmth of the people. Something that many politicians today try, but without any positive result.
Moreover, the political class to muted criticism of the Crown, merely to defend the Constitution and not much else from my point of view. And while some media is responsible for adding fuel to the fire and warm up the crowd with statements that do not leave indifferent no, I mean criticism Jimenez Los Santos to the personal figure of the King brandishing arguments such as: demanding his abdication of the King or his lack of support for victims of terrorism to a among many other things. Or as I have seen today in the Four mornings, when the presenter has read some other statements by Jiménez-Los Santos: " King should go with their business elsewhere and leave his son as successor."
information
All this chaos has been a gap opens on the role of the monarchy in this country. Are we better off with the Republic? ask each; and I replied, "We have gone so wrong with the monarchy?, With a Republic would be given to settle the territorial issue?," end up with problems or increase other?, "The church and the right to accept a republican regime what it all entails?
are questions that go unanswered and that apparently will not ever. But it has begun a period in which to discredit the monarchy is what matters. At least, let's vote of confidence in our constitutional monarchy, although we do not like to admit it, is the least given us problems in recent years.
by Dani.
Free Opinion: Do we need the King to give stability to our democracy?, "The monarchy is an outdated institution?